24/05/2013 :: Native MP4/H.264 playback AND new software licensing (ELS) now included in latest Beta 11.1.L. Please see the announcement
Welcome, Guest
Username Password: Remember me

TOPIC: .MTS Support

.MTS Support 2 years, 5 months ago #1193

  • McConnor
  • OFFLINE
  • Fresh Boarder
  • Posts: 4
Thanks for releasing such a famous software to the world!

As long as popular AVCHD Files produced by most of the HD-Amateur-Cams aren't imported the program remains something for professionals only.

My Canon HF100 produces AVCHD 1080i/p files (*.MTS) which can't be processed by Lightworks. I liked the first impression very much but like this the software as powerful as it might be is useless for me...

Please add support...

Re: .MTS Support 2 years, 5 months ago #1221

  • Bmud
  • OFFLINE
  • Fresh Boarder
  • Posts: 6
Hi. Best of luck on this project! (I harken from the Blender community)
I'll be speaking for myself, and a few of my friends who I linked on facebook.

" Hmmm. no support for AVCHD natively. It supports AVC-Intra, it's big brother, though. But that means it's almost useless to me, as it adds in the extra step of having to convert my format before the editing process *bleh*

Seems like a neat program though. I'll still toy around with it, in the hopes that they may add in support for my native format. " - A

Re: .MTS Support 2 years, 5 months ago #1897

  • erichon
  • OFFLINE
  • Fresh Boarder
  • Posts: 5
Hi

good start, but has to be improved:

Import of AVCHD m2ts and a proxy conversion would be good to play them smoothly, and where you can switch back to AVCHD and export to mpeg 2.

Eric

Re: .MTS Support 2 years, 5 months ago #1900

good start, but has to be improved


Watch the forum for progress on codec support over the next few weeks.

Re: .MTS Support 2 years, 3 months ago #6160

Hi,

just wanted to also say that support of (Panasonic) m2ts-files is highly appreciated. Please develop this feature soon.

Thomas

Re: .MTS Support 2 years, 3 months ago #6165

  • Bmud
  • OFFLINE
  • Fresh Boarder
  • Posts: 6
This subject came up again while I was at a party/concert thing. Two people I know that are way in to video editing were asking each other questions. The thing they got hung up on was...

"What do I do about AVCHD? I have a Panasonic. I can dumb it down to the lesser Intra format, but I really don't want to. I'll lose quality. I just got the newest Final Cut Pro, and it won't import my footage." - C

"Yeah. I have to convert my video in to a format before I edit. You just run it through a program to do that." - A

"That seems to defeat the purpose. In a way, it's no better than dealing with tapes." - Me

"And my camera isn't crappy. It's 'prosumer' i guess." - C

"AVCHD-Intra was made for the little HD camcorders you find at the department store. It's not bad, but people who use desktop editing software more often than not have a slightly nicer camera that uses AVCHD." - A

All of us sometimes work with smaller camcorders that are AVCHD-Intra, and they're fine when that's all you need. It's just that as soon as we bump up to the nicer cameras we use for making a film (a case where you use decent editing software), it's always in the AVCHD format.

We had all heard of Lightworks (through me), and agreed that AVCHD (not AVCHD-Intra) is the most important missing feature of all the high end video editing software packages. Premiere and FInal Cut had the same problem. I would have loved to refer them back to lightworks, but it's still suffering from only adding Intra so far.
Last Edit: 2 years, 3 months ago by Bmud.
Time to create page: 1.74 seconds
Copyright EditShare EMEA 2013